HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Thomas W. Cuddy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:20:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Since this thread is finally cooling off, I hesitate to weigh in, but...

Among my own archaeological colleagues in the greater Washington DC
area it is the military that is one of the biggest clients, even as private
contractors.  I can think of several projects off hand - at Aberdeen
Proving Ground in Maryland, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and even Vieques
Island in Puerto Rico.  In fact, I thought the federal agencies were all
hiring their own archaeologists in the last 15 years (or so) precisely
BECAUSE they were paying so much for outsourced archaeology. Which calls into question the rationales behind both the current job
review action and this entire thread of discussion.  --Tom

----------------------------
Thomas W. Cuddy
Curator of Archaeology
Historic Annapolis Foundation
18 Pinkney Street Annapolis, MD  21401
(410) 626-1032
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2