At 04:47 PM 03/01/97 -0700, you wrote:
>I oppose splitting just to do what was originally intended.  Bee-L was
>started to talk about bee biology.  The diversity of hobbiests, commercial
>beekeepers, apicultural inspectors, and researchers adds to the information
>exchange.  The problem should not be re-starting lists.  At issue is the
>purpose, which people quickly forget.  The objective is to discuss bee
>biology - if we could stick to that topic, it wouldn't matter who made up the
>list and there would be no need to split.
>
>Jerry Bromenshenk
>[log in to unmask]
 
This has been suggested several times.  It would help if someone would
describe just how far "bee biology" should go and where it stops.
 
Eric
 
Eric Abell
Gibbons, Alberta Canada
(403) 998 3143
[log in to unmask]