BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Al Lipscomb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Dec 2001 23:59:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>     Thanks for the answers to my query. The only thing is,
> both the main factors mentioned so far - cell size and colony
> density - also applied in the UK, and we didn't have an
> epidemic.

My thoughts are that the strain of bees involved (Italian) with it's
tendency to rob may have been part of the problem.

Also American Foul Brood is misnamed. I believe it came from Europe
(European Foul Brood from the United States). I believe the names came
from where they started causing problems. The European bee population
may have already developed a resistant trait to the bacteria involved.
When the bacteria arrived in the United States, with its relatively
closed gene pool, things got out of hand.

Just my thoughts.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2