BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:11:45 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Grant Gillard wrote:
> I'm hardly the expert on bee genetics, but it seems to be a rather fine line between mongralizing and hybridization.  
All in the eye of the beholder. Both end up with the same thing, a new 
mix of genes from the original "pure" strains. In the case of the 
hybrid, you try to (and nature might) stabilize it there. If it is not 
stable, it reverts backwards. In the case of the mongrel, you (and 
nature) do not care and keep on hybridizing toward stability.

Also, calling it a hybrid tends to sell better. An unintentional 
"Labrador-Collie-Shetland mix" sells better than a "mongrel" even though 
it clearly meets that definition.

Bill Truesdell ( a pure 
Scot-English-French-Italian-German-Dutch-Norse-African hybrid)
Bath, Maine

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2