BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:00:32 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
At a lecture at the Stoneleigh (UK) convention almost exactly a year ago Dr
Jeff Pettis described experiments he had conducted to see how far the tray
had to be below the mesh for fallen living varroa not to get back onto the
bees.  At a half inch space they all got back.  At 2 inches none did, with a
numerical gradient in between these extremes.

He was careful not to say that the mites jumped the gap.  He was unsure how
they bridged the space, but offered the suggestion that proximity to the bees
above the screen provided the stimulus to make their way back up.

Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2