BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:30 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<D9ECE76BCB2D4504A0E083F18D3A7E8F@office>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Peter Edwards < wrote:  66% of winter losses were queen failures with 2010 queens; we have also seen early supersedure in addition to the losses.  Older queens seem to be still going strong!

Thus it would seem that some condition(s) that was/were peculiar to last year during the time you raised and mated your 2010 queens made them more susceptible to failure.  Do you have anything in your notes that might point to some possibilities for this?

Mike in LA


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2