BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Timothy C. Eisele" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 May 2007 08:13:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Scot McPherson wrote:
> Organic beekeeping is far less costly than standard commercial practices.
> Less fuel costs, less medication costs, less lumber and wax replacement
> costs, healtier bees that don't need to be replaced as often and therefore
> build up faster since not new installations every year. 

A major cost item that I don't see on your list, is labor.  My 
understanding is that "organic" is expensive because is more 
labor-intensive than standard commercial practice.  Is your labor free?  
As a hobbyist, I don't have to worry about hiring help, but if I did, 
all the money I have invested in bees, equipment, and supplies in the 
last 8 years would barely be enough to pay for even one hired hand for 
13 weeks in the summer (at minimum wage).

Please, if you are going to make a strong statement about one beekeeping 
method being "cheaper" than another, don't leave out major cost items.

-- 
Tim Eisele
[log in to unmask]

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2