BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:58:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
John and Angie Partin wrote:
>
> I am talking about the first strip that came out. It's entirely possible
> that it wasn't Apistan.

I think you are talking about what happened about the time
resistance was showing up along with a batch of strips that were
not up to snuff. There was a lot of confusion as to what was
happening and both resistance and strip quality were suspect.
If I recall correctly, the suspect strips needed to be scratched
and they were as good as new. But if placed in the hive without
scratching, they were less effective. No conspiracy, only quality
control, if that.
Bill T
Bath, ME

ATOM RSS1 RSS2