>
>
> >I finally read the article
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X1930049X
>
This study has faults unfortunately common to studies that I read from that
part of the world.
The first is the history of the combs -- especially miticide and ag
chemical residues.
And they didn't include standard errors, which makes me question the
claimed statistical differences.
And it's just amazing how uniform the results were for all metrics.
I wouldn't run to far with their conclusions.
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html