BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:01:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
So it's important to take into account the *percentage* of precapping-age drone pupa at any given time relative to the percentage of 8-day worker brood.  For example, at a realistic ratio of 5% drone brood, Fuchs found around 35% of the mites entering drone brood.


When you do the math,  this shows that the Drone brood is more attractive than worker brood, for some other reason than just Open time, and random chance
That extra 48 hoours x 5% doesn’t come up to 1/3 the mites

Add to that,  and correct me if I am mistaken,  but mites enter the cell just before capping,  and that time period of open to mites would be fairly equal to either type brood (IE 12 hours before cappings)

Doesn’t that completely negate the concept that Mite selection of cells is random???



Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2