BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
huestis' <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:55:27 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Hi Allen,

> > > Also, as a follow-up on Joe and Oene's 4.9 experiment, Joe now reports
> > > that the bees have made a mess of the 4.9 foundation...

Did the bees draw the foundation on a major flow? There is a window for
getting good drawn 4.9. In my experience (2 yrs now) bees will not draw 4.9
well on a flow. Seems they produce a honey storage type cell that looks
similar to drone comb but rather inbetween size.Where the bees shaken down
on to foundation or given frames progressively? Strong colony or small
colonies?
What cell size did the bees draw?  Was it a transition type cell?

Clay

ATOM RSS1 RSS2