LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Did anyone read the latest Pediatrics?
From:
ruthy wilson rn ibclc <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 May 1997 00:45:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
page 746 or 9 the "Pediatricians' Responsibility for Infant nutrition"?????

why do I get an odd feeling that the focus though introduced as
breastfeeding spent an awful lot of text on formula issues?  Why were there
no Mds representing  the membership of Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine on
the committee?

am I whining? please kick me if I am.....ruthy.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2