LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Jan Barger RN, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Aug 1998 19:34:28 EDT
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Pat,

<< I'm not sure how the swelling can be attributed to the pitocin if she was
 being induced for pre eclampsia and was already holding fluids.  What's the
 reasoning? >>

There's a major difference in the swelling before and after the induction.
Generally the swelling is significantly more noticeable about 24 hours after
the induction.  It's dreadful.  And it happens in women who are not being
induced for pre-eclampsia.

I think it's a combo of the Pit + excess fluids from a prolonged epidural.

Whatever it is, it's nasty.

Jan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2