LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:42:30 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi guys,

Can you help me out here?  I was recently told that "research has completely
debunked the whole idea of foremilk and hindmilk."  Now, I'm getting this
second hand, so I wasn't able to ask for the specific research.  I know Peter
Hartmann has done some work that has changed our understanding a bit of
fore/hindmilk, but if someone could point me in the direction of legitimate
research that states there is NO fore/hind milk, I'd appreciate it.

Of course, should the day come that research demonstrates that not only is
there fore and hind milk, but also "quencher" milk and it takes "18 minutes
to get to the hindmilk" then I truly WILL go open a jewelry store!

Jan Barger -- who is ALSO wishing spring would come to Illinois!

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2