LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Renee Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 May 2005 17:24:11 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
 
In a message dated 5/4/2005 8:46:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Promoting/Defending a nurse that put a strangers baby
to her  breast?  This weakens our cause in general by
inciting further  negative attitudes toward
breastfeeding by focusing on a  "non-norm."   


Ok..I am probably opening my mouth to insert my own foot, I  wish to comment. 
 
 
While I do agree that putting a stranger's baby to breast is a  "non-norm" 
and not something I would do, I have a separate spin.  The use  of wet-nurses is 
well documented through history, and up until a few decades  ago, was quite 
normal.  In today's society, the idea of someone nursing  another's baby is 
"gross" or "nasty" or "wrong".  I owe another woman my  baby's life for wet 
nursing her during my time trying to figure out my milk  issues after gastric 
bypass.  Our story is a bit unique, and  a bit  "religious" so I apologize in 
advance if the Christian spin upsets anyone, but I  prayed desperately for God to 
provide a way that I would not have to resort to  abm for my infant.  I wanted 
her to have strictly breast milk, because I  knew in her delicate state abm 
could potentially cause more problems for her,  however my milk was not 
nourishing her as it should have.  During my LLL  meeting, a woman I knew only from 
the meetings and as the sister in law of my  LLL leader, was nursing twins 4 mos 
older than my daughter.  She was  becoming full and uncomfortable, and 
neither twin was the least bit interested  in nursing.  For some reason I just 
handed Cate to her and said "here nurse  her".  I was half joking, but then our 
eyes locked and I knew that A) my  prayer had been answered, and B) that there 
was nothing more natural in the  world than my baby be fed from the breast, even 
if it couldn't be mine.   Cate latched right on and for the first time in her 
tender life was nourished  until she was so full she dropped off with milk 
dribbling from her lips.   This woman agreed to nurse Cate whenever, and she 
pumped and froze milk.   This went on for 4 months.  There sad thing was, that as 
soon as I told  anyone what we were doing, the reactions were the opposite of 
what I  expected.  You would have thought I packed my infant up in worn 
blankets  and headed down to the river front to the homeless camps to find the 
dirtiest,  heroin-high prostitute to breast feed my infant.  No, I didn't know 
Melinda  that well, but I was fairly certain that a woman who exclusively bf 
twins and  attended LLL meetings regularly was a pretty safe bet.  I did a lot of  
educating of friends and relatives, my own husband was a bit iffy about it, 
but  after seeing Melinda nurse Cate, he too became convinced.  I am a firm  
believer in milk banks, and even wet nursing as long as a safe donor can be  
found.  I know LLL official stance on wet nursing is that we are not to  discuss 
it, and in no way do I want anyone to think that the LLL leader in my  group 
presented the idea to us or endorsed it by LLL.  This was something  that we 
came up with on our own and it worked.
 
Why this long winded story?  Because I do feel terribly  that the practice 
this nurse did was labeled as dirty and sexual and all those  things the general 
population  sees in breastfeeding.  I can tell you  that I have been in a 
department store (and other public places) when I have  heard a baby crying 
unconsolably in the next aisle and have wanted to do nothing  more than walk up to 
it and pick the poor thing up and put it to MY breast to  comfort it.  Not 
because I get sexual gratification from having an infant  at my breast but 
because I hate to see a poor babe suffering needlessly and wish  to comfort it.  I 
have witnessed first hand the beautiful act of  selflessness of a "stranger" 
who wanted to help my baby grow and thrive.   There is nothing dirty or 
disgusting about a baby eating where nature  intended. Of course bf is more than just 
about eating...it is also about  love, comfort, and safety...isn't that at the 
top of Maslow's Hierarchy of  Needs???  While I don't agree this nurse should 
have done this without the  parent's permission, I don't think she should 
have received that severe a  penalty, when based on what I read, she was only 
acting on her  heart.
 
Renee Drake RN CLC
 

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2