LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Linda J. Smith, BSE, FACCE, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Aug 1996 15:33:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
JoAnne Burke Snyder, I completely agree.  Having been helping moms for 22
years, I've found pacifier use at the root of many, many problems at all
stages of breastfeeding. Not all pacifier use leads to problems. But most of
the problems I see involve pacifier use. I've yet to find any documentation
or even a really scientific explanation that establishes routine pacifier use
in the breastfed baby as necessary or even useful except in rare, theraputic
situations (which is not routine).

I am convinced that the primary biological purpose of sucking is to bring in
calories, because gut enzymes are released every time a baby sucks.  Of
course, suck DOES other things in addition to taking in calories. The point
is that suck and calorie intake are always joined in biology.  Pacifiers
interrupt this - they separate suck from calorie intake. How does this
benefit the baby? Why would nature release gut enzymes in the absence of
food?  What does this do to the baby?

And why are some people so passionately attached to these devices?

Linda Smith, expecting some vigorous debate on this one!  Dayton, OH

ATOM RSS1 RSS2