LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marie Biancuzzo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:39:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
We're getting off-topic here, but the one that I think Nikki may be
thinking of is Rogers et al, 2000. However, as I recall that study, it was
talking about augmentation *not* social induction of labor. The outcome of
the study was cost (i.e., money) which, unfortunately, is what drives
health care these days.


>    Terriann writes about inductions for convenience.
>    I did some research on induction on Medline. I can't find this one
>particular abstract to give you the citation right now. However, the authors
>said that one advantage of induction was that it supported a Monday through
>Friday 9-5 obstetrical schedule, which made staffing easier. This was deemed
>Nikki Lee RN, MSN, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CIMI
--
Marie Biancuzzo, Perinatal Clinical Nurse Specialist
[log in to unmask]
Resources to simplify breastfeeding management are available at
http://www.wmc-worldwide.com

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2