BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:45:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:This is a huge point, Bill!  The release of this paper has not gone over 
well in Congress!  Nor in Australia. Nor with almond growers.

Randy Oliver
  
Is this paper supposed to be a conclusive statement?   Or is it a proposition of possibilities and/or probabilities?  Don't think it was published to make anyone happy or to reconcile positions.  This is a treatise concerning a possible cause or contributing factor in the CCD situation.  IMHO it is one of the first steps towards working towards an answer to the cause(s) of CCD, not an conclusive statement as to the cause.

Mike in LA

       
---------------------------------
Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool.

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2