BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Aitken <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 May 2002 19:42:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi Peter:

 > My reading of *not significant* is *not significant*.

> pb

Sad to say, but in statistics, "not significant" does not mean much.  To be
significant :-) , "not significant" must be accompanied by a significance
level.

For example, "not significant at the 5% level" means that there was a 5%
chance of the result being due to random variation between samples.

"Not significant" should not be construed as "meaningless".  A result which
is "not significant at the 1% level" can be quite significant at the 5%
level.


Best regards,

Donald Aitken


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2