BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
stephen j clark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Apr 1993 10:57:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dear Bee-Liners:
 
As a regular reader of this newsletter, I appreciate both the exchange of
information and the correction of misinformation.  However, I find ad
hominem attacks, an example of which follows, both boorish and unnecessary.
 
>                After such scholarly contributions about the spread of
>the European honeybee in the New World, it was a bit disappointing to
>read [...]'s message about bumblebee honey.  Here are some
>corrections:
 
        *       *       *       *       *       *       *
 
>Well, I'm sorry to be insulting, but I suspect that many Native Americ-
>ans were (and doubtless still ARE!) better naturalists than some academ-
>ic "ecologists"!
 
Let's try for a higher tone.
 
Stephen Clark
Vassar College

ATOM RSS1 RSS2