BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:10:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> My modest data set generally showed faster return to higher levels of
> mites after the 3 x 7-day regimens than after the 4 x 5-day series. Note
> this does not mean high, threshold-nudging mite numbers, just higher raw
> numbers that were still indicating acceptable control in both instances. I
> do weekly sticky board counts year-round, on every colony.d the SBB floor
> for doing stickies all the time.)
>

I would anticipate your observations since a difference between 90% and 95%
would lead to what you see. The 4x5 would definitely be more effective. I
do not need that level of control now as I am looking at another future
treatment because of local conditions and would not anticipate an issue
from mite buildup from now until late September or early October. Plus the
final broodless treatment in November ends up as the most important control.

Thank you for your detailed comments. They are very helpful. Glad your EFB
is under control. It has been deadly for some here in Maine.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2