BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:28:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Martin predicted that raising bees in small comb would create smaller bees, so that the effect of crowding the mites would be lost. I discussed this at length here when Martin's report first came out. 	("New study on cell size" Mon, 11 Mar 2002). This prediction was confirmed by the Berry study. 

Interest in small-cell foundation has been
fueled in part by observations of Martin and
Kryger (2002) that conditions which constrict
the space between the host pupa and male
protonymph mite promote male mite mortality.

However, as these authors point out, “reducing
cell sizes as a mite control method will
probably fail to be effective since the bees are
likely to respond by rearing correspondingly
smaller bees”. The present study supports this
deduction directly, and its premise indirectly:
average bee live weight in October was numerically
smaller in small-cell colonies than conventional.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2