>In addition to all that, in the same Conference sessions, we heard

> talk of interractions and also demonstrations of serious adverse
> effects from contact doses of as low as 0.5 ppb of a chemical which we
> were assured b y leading scientists would not have any significant
> effects at levels ten times that, and which were 'proven' by them by
> such field trials.
>

Allen, I assume that you are referring to the Suchail paper on IMD.  I don't
know how closely you have studied the data in that widely-cited paper (the
source of the 0.5ppb figure), but I find it wholly unconvincing, and largely
unsupported by several other studies before or since.  Might I suggest that
you closely inspect their survival graphs?

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L