BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:22:34 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Al Lipscomb
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>> These queenless bees oriented, foraged and stored pollen.  In other
>> words, looked just like a queenright colony!  I have observed the
>> same before but never in a colony which began (in their current hive,
>> anyway) queenless.
>>
>Drop in a frame with eggs and see how they react. If they pull cells then you
>know there is no queen. If, as George suggests, there is a virgin queen in the
>hive you will have young bees available when the new queen starts to lay.
I have been told that doing this at the wrong time might encourage a
freshly mated queen to lay too early and produce drones. Any comment? In
other words, leave the test till she has had time to mate and incubate.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2