BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Norton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:56:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Waldemar,

A postscript to my last message:

You had written, "He has a failing queen (poor brood pattern with a lot of
drone cells) and he's getting a new queen."

I neglected to suggest that you should look first to see if there was any
capped worker brood. A lack of worker brood and  the existence of drone
brood and a spotty pattern and/or drones the size of worker bees is
indicative of a worker layer; if there exists no worker brood with normal
sized drones then the queen is a drone layer. The former, worker layer, is
more difficult to introduce a new queen than the later. Recent discussion
on the BEE-L has dealt with queen introductions and various suggestions
with this problem. IMO this is best accomplished with a nuc having a good
queen and a nuc introduction board placed over the failing hive. Hope that
I have helped.

Regards,

Chuck

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2