BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Jul 2003 03:05:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
on 7/5/03 23:00, Automatic digest processor at [log in to unmask]
wrote:

Mike (me)wrote commenting about using expensive honey to build comb.
Bob wrote:
> Beekeepers in the Peace River district of Canada and the best honey
> producing areas of the U.S. (North Dakota)draw most comb on honey flows.

Not quibbling about quality of comb built from honey flows as apposed to
that from syrup.  Just thinking that using old comb for honey flows of
expected high priced honey would be more economical than scrapping old comb
and having bees use part of the nectar resources for new comb production
rather than for storage of high dollar honey.  Next question:  When does old
comb need to be replaced and can one plan for that in expected low honey
price years?

Mike

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2