BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Dartington <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:08:50 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Despite the known /believed? reduction in feral colonies post varooa, an
interesting experiment would be for the sole beekeeper in the city to note
down the number of bees to visit various patches of flowers within the city,
perhaps near to the complainant's home.  Then to shut in all his bee for a
day and recheck the number of foragers at work.  It might show that banning
his beekeeping would NOT totally eliminate risk to those who are allergic -
so undermining the core case for the ban.

It would at least enable some estimate of the number of foragers likely to
enter the complainant's property on any day -  (I will risk betting it would
be a very small number if there are so few colonies in the entire area).
Councillors might be persauded the complainant would be better off solving
their own personal problem by reducing attractive nectar sources close to
home than asking for a city-wide reduction in pollination of home-produced
fruit and veg.

Robin Dartington

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2