BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd A Bebb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:46:51 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Good point Randy. 
I keep hearing that neonics, in approved dosages and applications (only for the commercial guys) are harmful to pollinators as well, but while we wait for the reevaluation data, we will not know. 
While AB 1789 was not what I hoped it would be, at least it has set a finite date for determination and has caused a little hiccup in the pending "possibly frivolous" lawsuit. 
Any more thoughts on peer/public review of this mysterious registrant data?
Todd
SBBA.ORG

> On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:19 PM, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> I often hear claims that the neonic seed treatments are harmful to
> earthworm populations.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2