BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:47:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/08/09/thoughts-on-reproducibility-2

This is a website I read daily. It is medical but often has great general
discussions. This is a good read on reproducibility of experimental
results. The comments expand on the main article and touch on things like
statistics and personal bias.

I found the most interesting point was the bottom and top journals are the
ones most likely to have reproducibility issues. Obviously for different
reasons. But it does give pause in taking any study at face value until it
can be reproduced. Even from Journals like Science.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2