BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:28:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
My post raised another observation/question. What if the delay in releasing
queens is a cause of queen failure with newly installed packages.

Might not be a far fetched as it seems. We know that larva release
pheromones. If the pheromones are not present, that might indicate a queen
failure to the workers and they would take appropriate action and supersede
the queen at the earliest time after they have some eggs to work with. That
would put "queen failure" at 10 days and beyond until she starts laying
after release. 10 days assumes immediate start of laying and 3 days until
larva show up.Then you have the delay until the pheromones reach the level
to signal all is well.

So immediate release would help prevent queen "failure" associated with
packages.

Again, happy to be corrected.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2