BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:24:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
The selling point of FGMO is that it is a "natural" method of Varroa
control and uses a safe chemical.

In Maine, ApiLifeVar was approved under a Section 18 for Varroa control.
The State Bee Inspector in our State newsletter reminded those who might
use it that while Apistan and Cumophose carry a Caution label, Thymol
carries a Danger label, which means it is highly toxic - only a few
drops to a teaspoon will kill, while Caution takes over an ounce).

With FGMO you are putting it into an aerosol form, plus in an applicator
under pressure. I doubt the EPA had that in mind as an application
method for Thymol.

I wonder why FGMO continually has to have things added, the formulation
changed, application method altered, or the hive manipulated to be
effective (just take a look at its BeeL "evolution" in the archives
where each stage was said to control Varroa).

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2