BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adrian Wenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Sep 1994 07:45:13 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Jean-Marie wrote:
 
>3/ In Europe we have really the problem of the dead of the wild-feral
>   honeybees.  Maybe a resistant line shall appear, but all the
>   beekeepers treatments against the mites, diminish the speed of
>   appearance of this resistant line (we don't see which is resistant
>   and which is not).
 
   When all beekeepers treat infested colonies with one miticide or
another, the net result will most likely be better strains of mites, a
phenomenon pointed out very lucidly in chapter 1 of Paul DeBach's book,
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL BY NATURAL ENEMIES (1974, Cambridge University Press).
 
   Feral honey bee colonies, by contrast, will not be treated with
miticides and almost all will perish.  The real hope for the future of
beekeeping is for all of us to locate and monitor the health of feral
colonies, particularly those not likely to be recently emitted from
commercial colonies.  Eventually those colonies can provide the breeding
stock necessary for development of resistant strains.
 
                                                        Adrian
 
***************************************************************
* Adrian Wenner        E-Mail   [log in to unmask]  *
* Department of Biology        Office Phone    (805) 893-2838 *
* University of California     Lab Phone       (805) 893-2838 *
* Santa Barbara, CA  93106     FAX             (805) 893-4724 *
***************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2