BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:58:49 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Robin, (and other relatives of chicken little)

> Curious statement when just about every scientist  working on the problem
> has concluded otherwise.  Just because some truth may be inconvenient
> does
> not justify going into denial.

Why then is it necessary for the UK to spend £12m to convince the public
that this is so.  Why then are those concerned really pseudo scientists.

Genuine scientist have measured a genuine increase in atmospheric CO2
from pre-industrial levels of about 280ppmv to approximately 375ppmv now
(most of this increase has occurred since 1950 when it was ~310ppmv).

On the other hand the measurable increase in near-surface temperatures
comes from prior to 1950.  Unfortunately this increase came from a
period of "abnormal" low temperatures.  Real measured changes in
temperature fall well below normal variations, even within seasons.  The
whole "global warming" scam is rejected by real scientists.

Tom Elliott
Chugiak, AK

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2