BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:12:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
The critiques of "surveys" here on Bee-L correlate strongly to a lack of any
effort to understand the sophisticated statistical methods that can be used
in survey analysis.

I already quoted Katie Lee, of BIP, who pointed out the shortcomings of the BIP surveys. There is a long article in this week's New Yorker which lists the many failures of surveys and polling in general. 

You refer to "sophisticated statistical methods that can be used in survey analysis." This fails to acknowledge the fact that Garbage In, Garbage Out. No amount of post processing can turn gravel into gold. 

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2