BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hugo Thone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:59:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Medhat Nasr wrote:
>
> .
> .
> For monitoring varroa mites, we use natural fall of mites on sticky
> boards in 24 h. If the number of fallen varroa mites/hive/24h is 5-10
> in spring treatment is required. In the fall if the number of fallen
> (Late august-early September) is >100mites/hive/24h treatment is
> required.
>


These figures for natural fall seem extremely high to me.
I have been monitoring natural mite fall this summer during
approx. 2 months : I counted max. 5 mites/hive/week
(I was not using sticky boards)                ^^^^

When I treated my colonies at the end of August with Apistan,
the mite drop increased to a few hundered mites the first two
days and then decreased very fast.
This corresponds with what I found on a danish website :
natural mite drop x 100 = real varroa population in the colony.

cheers,

Hugo (the half a bee)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2