BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Chiang Mai <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:35:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Well it sounds like you have an interesting concern here but ....   for my understanding there is a bit missing.

Are there any statistics that compare the average tongue length of each type of bee?  I was not aware that Apis Mellifera would have a materially different tongue length to say Apis Cerana.  If that is the case then is it not possible that red clover (as cited) depends on a different insect or method for pollination?

You say "So when the Minnesota poster bowed to political pressure and showed a native bumblebee in every panel of the poster of "bees", they did a huge disservice overall."  I beg to disagree.  They did a huge service.  The poster was to communicate information / a concept,  and they related directly to the target audience, the general public.  The general public can identify with a bumble bee, they know it is a bee.  Any other type of bee could be a wasp, a hornet, a fly ....  who knows.  A bumble bee is certain.  Effective communication and that is the goal.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2