BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peter L. Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:53:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
In this interesting study, different subspecies of honey bee were
compared to see if the type of collected is related to the type of
bee. Evidently, it isn't.


Comparison of pollen spectra collected by four different subspecies of
the honey bee Apis mellifera by Kirsten Köpplera, et al

Colonies belonging to 4 subspecies of Apis mellifera, namely A. m.
capensis, A. m. ligustica, A. m. carnica and A. m. mellifera were
placed, one colony per subspecies, at 5 sites with a high floral
diversity in the Taunus region in Germany. A total amount of 4008.3 g
of pollen loads were trapped during 3 seasons and 214 different pollen
types were identified.

The comparison of pollen spectra did not result in a separation of the
subspecies. Date of sampling and sampling site, however, had a major
effect on the composition of pollen samples. Furthermore, subspecies
were not significantly different in the structure of dominance,
evenness and diversity of pollen types.

-- 
Peter L. Borst

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2