BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rip Bechmann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:47:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>>>The latter reportedly cannot suppress varroa very well, but the SMR
bees do suppress mite reproduction quite well -- just not the way the
researchers initially thought.<<<

Since the onset of the search for Varroa tolerant/resistant bees I have
rationalized that the first thing needed was a bee that "knew one when it
saw one".  Perhaps both strains are "hygienic" for the same reasons but
SMR "recognizes" Varroa as a foreign entity and something to be "cleaned
out" whereas Spivak's HYG bees are "barn blind" in that respect.

I seem to recall reading somewhere that Varroa are so "integrated" into
their host biology that they utilize some hemolymph contents directly,
i.e. without digesting them.  Composed of bee material as they are, bees
need to "recognize" them as different.   Bees, of whatever species.
already have grooming behaviors, etc. to deal with external parasites and
"unhealthy brood".  These can be co-opted, for use against Varroa, by
Apis mellifera only when they "see" Varroa , for what it "really" is,
rather than just another appendage.

Rip

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2