BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andy Nachbaur <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Dec 1997 10:59:55 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>Murray says:
 
>The financial and credibility penalties which would be suffered by any
>company offering seriously dangerous substances without giving full
>information on the product and its usage would nowadays be extreme,
>particularly in the USA. These companies have their own long term
>futures to consider so do you really consider they would throw it all
>away just to make a fast buck out of a bunch of beekeepers? I don't
>think so.
 
Can I interest anyone who even half believes in the above in buying the
Golden Gate Bridge?
(c)Permission is given to copy this document
in any form, or to print for any use.
 
(w)OPINIONS are not necessarily facts. USE  AT OWN RISK!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2