BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Yarnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:29:00 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
Who's going to research it?  Nothing in for the Drug companies.  Not much
in it for the medical profession at all.  That kind of study takes
funding, is complex, and in the US, not much "unfettered" money is
cirulating in academia these days.

We don't tout it for the purpose but have plenty of folks who swear by the
method.  And, from a non-scientific rube's pov it makes sense.  Allergies
are "treated" by exposing the patient to minute but increasing doses of
the agents which cause the reaction.  In unfiltered honey you have minute
doses of _some_ of the agents to which patients may be alergic.  Needless
to say, the menu of possibilities, while long in the local plant kingdom,
is woefully short on canine and feline dander and house mites.

On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Mea McNeil wrote:

> >people who swear it helps their allergies.

> ... Has subsequent research shown that such a link exists?

---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine     | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban   | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey                | leave our kids a decent place to live.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2