BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Hosticka <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:49:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Interesting discussion all around.

My observation running typically very large colonies is that the foraging activity is directly related to the available resources and that a static measurement of percentages needs to consider this. Large colonies don't send a high percentage of foragers out on futile missions and conversely when an abundant flow is on they recruit a higher than normal number to that activity. A good measure and I don't know if Jerry's counters can see it is what number of bees are scouts looking for forage and what number are bringing home the groceries. Anicdotily I can say that a large colony on a strong flow will have noticeably fewer house bees during daytime inspection and the same colony during a dearth will have a lot loafing around and hanging out on the porch. Receivers and processors are limited by the available storage space but if given empty comb will balance their tasks to the incoming nectar. Without nectar incoming perhaps more scouts go looking but even more foragers just take the day off.

Sounds like a good plan but alas we have a strong flow so I have to go to work. 

Paul Hosticka
Dayton WA

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2