BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:21:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
A couple of other questions. Were there only two controls, or are the hives
that died all controls?
The controls got no treatment, at least that is my guess. Or did they? What
other preventative measures were used, if any? When was the sampling taken?
We know that mite drop occurs with the introduction of FGMO, so you will
get reduced mite count after an application.

If the others that died were not controls, then you have 20% mortality in
the group with the controls- both died- and 24% mortality in the other
apiary with no controls.

It is a little difficult to see just what is going on with the data
presented, other than FGMO works 75% of the time.

Bill T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2