Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Modified Dadant Hives
From:
Garry Libby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 1 May 2000 23:51:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Lloyd Spear wrote: "Unfortunately, when I changed it was to
deeps, and now I know I should have changed to mediums."

Lloyd, when I started keeping bees I used two deeps on one hive and three
mediums on the other to see which way I thought was better. The three
mediums are a lot lighter to lift but You also spend more time inspecting
the brood chamber as You have to manipulate thirty frames as compared to
twenty using three deeps.  Last year I started three hives with a medium on
the bottom and a deep above. That setup reminded Me of the depth of the
Jumbo. If You were not going to move the hives would You still feel they
were too heavy to use? Or do You think one Jumbo would not be large enough
for a brood chamber in the Northeast? Only manipulating ten frames would be
a lot faster than thirty.
Thanks,
Garry Libby
Attleboro, Massachusetts, USA
41.56 N    71.17 W
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV