Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Foulbrood
From:
Harry Goudie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 19:20:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> The policy of burning and burying the contents of infected hives combined
> with a compensation scheme financed by the beekeepers themselves has
enabled
> the UK to reduce the incidence of AFB to about 1% and keep it at that
> seemingly irreducible level for many years.

I suppose this 1% will be due to feral colonies and colonies which have not
been reported with the disease.
Is there actually a law which states that foulbrood must be reported?  I ask
this because it does not seem to be the case for varroa.  In the case of
varroa there seems to be no obligation to either report or to treat an
infestation.

Harry

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV