BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 10 May 1999 09:09:42 -0600
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Computer Software Solutions Ltd wrote:
> What I was wondering about is, what is wrong with having some tiny little
> nucs with maybe only two standard frames...  We then have the queen on a
normal frame in a nuc which most
> texts suggest makes introduction far easier.

Hi Tom:

We have been using nucs with 3 standard frames for some years to mate
queens from. We put one frame of brood, one frame of honey, and one frame
of pollen with the adhering bees plus a ripe queen cell. They seem to work
quite well.

Best regards,

Donald Aitken
Edmonton Alberta Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2