Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Jan 1998 11:13:57 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Both Mary and Murray wrote of organic organizations that set honey standards and
showed that they can work.
Don't disagree. But this is a US government standard. I worked in the US government
and know that regulations can take on a life of their own. Plus, you do not know
the power that obscure GS-11's like to exert when backed by some new regulation.
And they never die (the reg, not the GS-11.). But they do expand (both this time-
need more GS-11s to enforce the expanded regulation).
In Maine we have a strong organic organization with farm organic standards- both
veggies and farm animals. The standards have evolved with time to reflect good
organic practice and attainability. For example, using their guidelines antibiotics
can be used on farm animals . The Maine honey standards are not realistic but, in
time they would be modified to reflect attainable, good practices.
That sort of common sense evolution is unlikely with a government regulation.
Unless you have the means to influence the "process".
Where is Tom Jefferson when you need him?
Bill Truesdell
Bath, ME
j h & e mcadam wrote in part:
> The National Association for Sustainable Agriculture (NASA) has a
> certification system for organic produce and has produced a standard
> applicable to honey. When I queried this some years back there was one
> beekeeper in Australia who was deemed to have met all the standards and to
> be qualified to label his/her honey as "organic".
>
|
|
|