Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 1997 18:38:48 GMT+0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi All
I have recieved a number of posts about something I metnioned about
combining what we here in A.m.capensis country call a laying worker
hive.
Normal bees, ie A.m.everything else can develop laying workers that
lay drone eggs.
Our bees here, develop laying workers that lay clone eggs. IE every
egg they lay is a copy of themselves and is a fully fledged femal
worker bee. As you can see this has a number of important problems.
If you get a swam and the queen does not get caught, you end up with
a hive that has brood but not enought to grow. It draws comb even,
forages for pollen, and can even swarm. Sometimes as the LW gets old
they will swarm and a new queen will be raised. This is cool. More
often than not one ends up with a sill foul smelling hive that is
docile and stupid. I hate laying workers.
But: if any other sub-species of bee should be in the area of a
A.m.capenis hive, if it's queen should die, or get weak, a capensis
worker will be brought in to substitute her as they smell more queen
like, the colony will be capensised and die of largely. Hence
beekeepers in the transvaal have had to kill of thousands and
thousands of contaminated hives because of migratory beekeepers
taking hives up there.
So: the queen is not the only egg layer!
Keep well
Garth
---
Garth Cambray Kamdini Apiaries
15 Park Road Apis melifera capensis
Grahamstown 800ml annual precipitation
6139
Eastern Cape
South Africa Phone 27-0461-311663
3rd year Biochemistry/Microbiology Rhodes University
In general, generalisations are bad.
Interests: Flii's and Bees.
|
|
|