BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Fluvalinate residues
From:
Conrad Sigona <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 May 1997 17:26:34 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<l03020901afa60e8742da@[205.138.55.60]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Conrad Sigona <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (13 lines) 
> >2. 70.8% of beeswax samples from outside of Germany contain detectible
> >levels of fluvalinate (compared to 13.2 % of German samples).
>
> Hate to ask a dumb question, but why the difference? Do German beekeepers
> not use Apistan?
 
Knowing from personal experience how fastidious Germans are, I would
bet that Germans are more likely than most to strictly follow the rules
for applying Apistan.
 
Conrad Sigona
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2