Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 1997 13:12:37 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 10 Jan 97 at 18:42, Ian Watson wrote: Re: Varroa and Chalkbrood
> > 2 Why do we requeen, when it has been proved that it is not genetic.
> > Comments?
>
> Yes...
>
> How do you mean, "that it is not genetic"...?
There seems to be a variety of views regarding chalkbrood. "it's a spore,
it's caused by dampness, it's caused by chilled brood" neither of the
above is caused by the Queen! I know the accepted procedure is to requeen.
My point, if we have a good strong laying queen, why bother to change her,
when it's not her fault.
I tend to question some of our accepted methods, some just don't make
sense to me and this is one of them!
Any one want to comment?
*********************************************************
The Bee Works, 9 Progress Drive Unit 2, Orillia,
Ontario, Canada. L3V 6H1
David Eyre, Owner. Phone/Fax 705 326 7171
Agents for E.H.Thorne & B.J.Sherriff UK
http://www.muskoka.net/~beeworks
*********************************************************
|
|
|