BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Chalkbrood
From:
Dave Black <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jan 1997 11:10:31 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
In message <[log in to unmask]>, David Eyre
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>       2 Why do we requeen, when it has been proved that it is not genetic.
>Comments?
Whether it is genetic or not I view requeening in this instance as
'another shake of the dice'. If it is genetic we get another chance of
getting it 'right'. If its not the improvement in the colony's brood
production and general vigour may do the trick.
--
Dave Black
Blacks Bee Gardens,
Guildford, GU1 4RN.  UK.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2